Forskningen undersøger, hvordan menneskers tendens til tribalism og parochialism, som indebærer at behandle medlemmer af egen gruppe mere velvilligt end dem uden for gruppen, kan være en adaptiv reaktion på trusler fra aggressive koalitioner. Det præsenteres, hvordan mænds koalitionsaggression kan have påvirket sociale psykologier forskelligt for mænd og kvinde
Titel på undersøgelse:
Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis.
| |
Hele abstrakt på originalsprog:
The social science literature contains numerous examples of human tribalism and parochialism-the tendency to categorize individuals on the basis of their group membership, and treat ingroup members benevolently and outgroup members malevolently. We hypothesize that this tribal inclination is an adaptive response to the threat of coalitional aggression and intergroup conflict perpetrated by ‘warrior males’ in both ancestral and modern human environments. Here, we describe how male coalitional aggression could have affected the social psychologies of men and women differently and present preliminary evidence from experimental social psychological studies testing various predictions from the ‘male warrior’ hypothesis. Finally, we discuss the theoretical implications of our research for studying intergroup relations both in humans and non-humans and discuss some practical implications.